Harris’ economics fails, just like the left’s healthcare system.
The senators of the United States came together in a 10 minutes unmoderated caucus and instantly broke up into their respective parties. Of course, we know that the Republican Party is the party of the health care. Kamala Harris mentioned, “We hope to find some common ground with the Republicans,” but what common ground is there when we are clearly on top.
The single payer healthcare system is evidently flawed, just like Harris’ economics. The United States spent 17.1% of its GDP on healthcare in 2014. This obscene sum of money could have saved, cognisant that we still have a national debt of $22.03 trillion. This point was brought up by the left, and it destroyed themselves just like how Thanos used the stones to destroy the stones. If the left is not part of the solution, then they are merely the problem.
Harris also mentioned that “We cannot make healthcare great again if healthcare was never great in the first place.” As ironic as it may sound, but wasn’t Obama the one who promised to save the American healthcare system in 2008? Healthcare was never great in the first place due to the fact that the Affordable Care Act is like a colourblind interior designer ― frivolous and doesn’t serve its purpose. In fact, it places unnecessary tariffs on the people, if they do not wish to purchase insurance.
Also, why isn’t the left addressing the fact that 21% of the nation’s hospitals are for-profit, since healthcare is a right, and should be accessible and cheap. These doctors and practitioners have to charge exorbitant fees for their services in order to continue operating and generate a profit. Apart from that, insurance companies are raising premiums, putting additional burden on consumers. Finally, when a pharmaceutical manufacturer makes an important discovery and introduces a new medication into the market, the immediate demand for it creates an inordinate surge in cost ― the manufacturers do not want a profit, they want a killing (literally, to an extent that consumers are unable to afford their necessary medications).
Hence, families, individuals and businesses should be able to purchase healthcare insurance nationwide to heighten competition. Furthermore, the privatisation of the healthcare sector is essential as it permits individuals to obtain insurance privately or from organisations of their choice, granting them liberty, and bridging the gap between retirement and Medicare eligibility. Competition also ensures the public is better educated about preventative healthcare and treatment options. It forces providers to be more transparent to consumers pertaining to the costs of treatment, and also competitive pricing. Lesser quality providers get weeded out as they get priced out of malpractice insurance. I am assured to see the Republicans, namely Romney, direct the Senate in this direction. He has proposed brilliant ideas such as giving states block grants and empowering them with the decision of what to do with the money. This enables state governments to create a public option for their state (simply to satisfy the Democrats), by presenting an option for people who can’t afford private insurance, and permitting the benefits of competition and the market to work. Private insurers will then lower their premiums and copayments as they need the consumers. The benefits of this system are innumerable. Unironically, Horrendous Harris only knows how to scream, “Is it because I am a woman; Is it because I am black,” and does not know how to actually use her nonexistent mind to think about ideas to clean up the mess made by Obama.
With all that said, it is obvious that the Senate should push for a more conservative solution that is balanced, as all things should be ― privatisation, and stop blithering on their futile ACA or single payer system. Hotel? Trivago ; Healthcare? Republican.
The senators of the United States came together in a 10 minutes unmoderated caucus and instantly broke up into their respective parties. Of course, we know that the Republican Party is the party of the health care. Kamala Harris mentioned, “We hope to find some common ground with the Republicans,” but what common ground is there when we are clearly on top.
The single payer healthcare system is evidently flawed, just like Harris’ economics. The United States spent 17.1% of its GDP on healthcare in 2014. This obscene sum of money could have saved, cognisant that we still have a national debt of $22.03 trillion. This point was brought up by the left, and it destroyed themselves just like how Thanos used the stones to destroy the stones. If the left is not part of the solution, then they are merely the problem.
Harris also mentioned that “We cannot make healthcare great again if healthcare was never great in the first place.” As ironic as it may sound, but wasn’t Obama the one who promised to save the American healthcare system in 2008? Healthcare was never great in the first place due to the fact that the Affordable Care Act is like a colourblind interior designer ― frivolous and doesn’t serve its purpose. In fact, it places unnecessary tariffs on the people, if they do not wish to purchase insurance.
Also, why isn’t the left addressing the fact that 21% of the nation’s hospitals are for-profit, since healthcare is a right, and should be accessible and cheap. These doctors and practitioners have to charge exorbitant fees for their services in order to continue operating and generate a profit. Apart from that, insurance companies are raising premiums, putting additional burden on consumers. Finally, when a pharmaceutical manufacturer makes an important discovery and introduces a new medication into the market, the immediate demand for it creates an inordinate surge in cost ― the manufacturers do not want a profit, they want a killing (literally, to an extent that consumers are unable to afford their necessary medications).
Hence, families, individuals and businesses should be able to purchase healthcare insurance nationwide to heighten competition. Furthermore, the privatisation of the healthcare sector is essential as it permits individuals to obtain insurance privately or from organisations of their choice, granting them liberty, and bridging the gap between retirement and Medicare eligibility. Competition also ensures the public is better educated about preventative healthcare and treatment options. It forces providers to be more transparent to consumers pertaining to the costs of treatment, and also competitive pricing. Lesser quality providers get weeded out as they get priced out of malpractice insurance. I am assured to see the Republicans, namely Romney, direct the Senate in this direction. He has proposed brilliant ideas such as giving states block grants and empowering them with the decision of what to do with the money. This enables state governments to create a public option for their state (simply to satisfy the Democrats), by presenting an option for people who can’t afford private insurance, and permitting the benefits of competition and the market to work. Private insurers will then lower their premiums and copayments as they need the consumers. The benefits of this system are innumerable. Unironically, Horrendous Harris only knows how to scream, “Is it because I am a woman; Is it because I am black,” and does not know how to actually use her nonexistent mind to think about ideas to clean up the mess made by Obama.
With all that said, it is obvious that the Senate should push for a more conservative solution that is balanced, as all things should be ― privatisation, and stop blithering on their futile ACA or single payer system. Hotel? Trivago ; Healthcare? Republican.
Comments
Post a Comment