Who is to blame for the current crisis in Africa? What will become of our home?
“Imagine if you wake up one day to find your house flooded,” proclaimed a delegate from Namibia. Animals are being displaced. Water is being contaminated. The Namibia Inquiry is suggesting that they rely on their on competence for what lies ahead, seeing that the Hardap Inquiry has thoroughly failed to provide any sort of assistance, and even managed to wreak further havoc in Arano and Botswana.
The issue stands as a threat to the well-being of Namibia - due to the “illegal and rash” actions of the Hardap Enquiry to embark on irrigation (as admitted by the Hardap delegates themselves), Namibia is being flooded. Unfortunately, Namibia is also facing a drought, making this crisis a culmination of problems, tumbling down like a waterfall. This flooding in turn resulted in the migration of animals as they are no longer able to reside in their original habitats, the water is also “extremely contaminated”.
What does Namibia plan on doing? After relying on the Hardap delegates to take proper action and solve the issue of Human-Wildlife Conflict and being mistreated, they plan to take action by themselves, coming up with various feasible ideas such as water pumping, filtration and growing plants in water-logged areas. According to Laura Macalister, who gave a “cost-price effect analysis”, purification of water is not as feasible due to the “unfriendly environment” and extremely high costs that Namibia will not be able to foot, even with the aid of other other African countries. However, she says that the pumping of flooded contaminated water can be instead reallocated to be used as drinking water for the animals, claiming that such animals are already used to drinking such water, unlike us, who drink from pristine taps in Africa.
In an interview with Simson Uri-Khob, the biggest issue at hand was the Aranos area, which was currently uninhabitable. He says that this needs to be fixed by dealing with the poorly planned out irrigation, and proposed a joint council meeting. As for the joint council meeting, he says that should it fail, namibia should hold a press release to gain the support of its people. Yet, he hopes that the meeting will allow the two councils to pool together their collective fundings in order to pull through the crisis with effective solutions. Regarding the planting of seedlings in water-logged areas, Simson Uri-Khob agreed wholeheartedly, proclaiming that the leader of the directive has had experience in such projects, and will able to use their expertise once more.
During the recent press conference in the Hardap Inquiry, when asked about the feasibility of the joint council meeting, delegates such as Zebra Kasete has agreed that it will indeed be a session where the two opposing sides can come together to discuss on an even platform, to reduce misunderstandings and to fully understand the demands and needs of both sides. However, the Hardap Inquiry is currently facing a crisis of its own, unsure as to how they will be able to make up for their transgressions against Namibia, and their internal flaws, calling each other within the council “incompetent”. Hopefully these two councils will be able to come together to solve their crises.
The delegates of the Namibia Enquiry have said that what they needed the Hardap Inquiry to do is to take competent action, instead of causing even more grief to Africa as a whole, poisoning the people with cyanide pills and instigating riots that finished off a total of 19 officials. As Julian Fennessy has put in a speech, he is “optimistic about solving the crisis at hand”. Sharing the same sentiments, delegates of Namibia are currently “trying their best” to mitigate the effects of irrigation. Will it end favourably?
“Imagine if you wake up one day to find your house flooded,” proclaimed a delegate from Namibia. Animals are being displaced. Water is being contaminated. The Namibia Inquiry is suggesting that they rely on their on competence for what lies ahead, seeing that the Hardap Inquiry has thoroughly failed to provide any sort of assistance, and even managed to wreak further havoc in Arano and Botswana.
The issue stands as a threat to the well-being of Namibia - due to the “illegal and rash” actions of the Hardap Enquiry to embark on irrigation (as admitted by the Hardap delegates themselves), Namibia is being flooded. Unfortunately, Namibia is also facing a drought, making this crisis a culmination of problems, tumbling down like a waterfall. This flooding in turn resulted in the migration of animals as they are no longer able to reside in their original habitats, the water is also “extremely contaminated”.
What does Namibia plan on doing? After relying on the Hardap delegates to take proper action and solve the issue of Human-Wildlife Conflict and being mistreated, they plan to take action by themselves, coming up with various feasible ideas such as water pumping, filtration and growing plants in water-logged areas. According to Laura Macalister, who gave a “cost-price effect analysis”, purification of water is not as feasible due to the “unfriendly environment” and extremely high costs that Namibia will not be able to foot, even with the aid of other other African countries. However, she says that the pumping of flooded contaminated water can be instead reallocated to be used as drinking water for the animals, claiming that such animals are already used to drinking such water, unlike us, who drink from pristine taps in Africa.
In an interview with Simson Uri-Khob, the biggest issue at hand was the Aranos area, which was currently uninhabitable. He says that this needs to be fixed by dealing with the poorly planned out irrigation, and proposed a joint council meeting. As for the joint council meeting, he says that should it fail, namibia should hold a press release to gain the support of its people. Yet, he hopes that the meeting will allow the two councils to pool together their collective fundings in order to pull through the crisis with effective solutions. Regarding the planting of seedlings in water-logged areas, Simson Uri-Khob agreed wholeheartedly, proclaiming that the leader of the directive has had experience in such projects, and will able to use their expertise once more.
During the recent press conference in the Hardap Inquiry, when asked about the feasibility of the joint council meeting, delegates such as Zebra Kasete has agreed that it will indeed be a session where the two opposing sides can come together to discuss on an even platform, to reduce misunderstandings and to fully understand the demands and needs of both sides. However, the Hardap Inquiry is currently facing a crisis of its own, unsure as to how they will be able to make up for their transgressions against Namibia, and their internal flaws, calling each other within the council “incompetent”. Hopefully these two councils will be able to come together to solve their crises.
The delegates of the Namibia Enquiry have said that what they needed the Hardap Inquiry to do is to take competent action, instead of causing even more grief to Africa as a whole, poisoning the people with cyanide pills and instigating riots that finished off a total of 19 officials. As Julian Fennessy has put in a speech, he is “optimistic about solving the crisis at hand”. Sharing the same sentiments, delegates of Namibia are currently “trying their best” to mitigate the effects of irrigation. Will it end favourably?
Comments
Post a Comment